It was a simple challenge: step one- lie to the public, step
two- wait to be challenged; little did I know I would commit hours to
reupholstering a couch as well. “Oh yes I hand dyed all of the fabric with
fresh meat”. An elaborate story was told about being elbow deep in a blood
soaked bathtub, scrunching and sloshing cloth around to get the right grungy
look. Despite the uncanny pink color and lack of odor no one took me for a
liar.
It was
because as the artist in the gallery I had the upper hand- the control. No one
wanted to question my methods for fear of insulting me, going against their
friends or looking uneducated. It is not the norm to question art right? It is
made by “gifted individuals” to be admired by envious crowds. “I wish I had
some sort of artistic talent.” I hear far too often when really the question
should be “Why haven’t I though about it like this before?”
This was only a college campus
gallery setting among peers. Imagine the power this monolithic idea has when
backed by billions of dollars in advertising and image building. It is this
unwillingness to question. The Milgram Experiment (1963) presents only an
assumption of authority- no real consequence existed for participants.
Recently a discussion came about
where I was challenged: that this obedience is fading fast and that people are
quickly waking up. I argued that no, we like to think we are waking up- it
makes us feel better, and secondly, no, look at the meat couch. A simple
question: What is this material? If an audience is not willing to question an
unassuming peer about a detail so trivial- why should they question the
patterns that they have been living out for generations?
No comments:
Post a Comment